INVITED REVIEW ARTICLE
Stature Lengthening Using the
PRECICE Intramedullary Lengthening Nail
Dror Paley, MD, FRCSC • Kevin Debiparshad, MD, FRCSC • Halil Balci, MD • Walter Windisch, PhD • Craig Lichtblau, MD
Page 4 - RESULTS
Overall goals of achieving length were excellent. Documented
preoperative lengthening goals were 6.2 cm (range, 2.5
to 8.0 cm). Radiographically measured lengthening achieved
was 5.6 cm (range, 1.7 to 8.0 cm). For the P1 group, the preoperative
goal was 6.0 cm (range, 2.5 to 6.5 cm) and final
length achieved was 5.2 cm (range, 1.7 to 6.5 cm) (Fig. 5). For
the P2 group, the preoperative goal was 6.3 cm (range, 4.0 to
8.0 cm) and the final length achieved was 6.0 cm (range, 2.5 to
8.0 cm) (Fig. 6).
Rate of distraction was calculated as total length gained
divided by total number of days of distraction. The overall rate
of distraction for the entire group 0.83 mm/d (range, 0.48 to
1.1 mm/d); 0.82 mm/d for P1 and 0.85 mm/d for P2. For femurs
alone 0.88 mm/d (range, 0.57 to 1.1 mm/d) and for tibias alone
0.63 mm/d (range, 0.46 to 0.91 mm/d).
RADIOGRAPHIC DATA
The mechanical lateral proximal femoral angle
(mLDFA), posterior distal demur angle (PDFA), posterior
proximal tibial angle (PPTA), and medial proximal tibial angle
(MPTA) were measured before and after lengthening. For
femoral lengthening the mean mLDFA before and after are
87.3 degrees (± 1.9 degrees) and 87.6 degrees (± 1.9 degrees),
respectively. This difference was not statistically significant
(P = 0.06). For femurs the mean PDFA preoperative was 81.1
degrees (± 1.3 degrees) and postoperative 81.0 degrees (± 1.6
degrees). This was not statistically significantly different
(P = 0.34). For tibial lengthening, the mean preoperative MPTA was 86.5 degrees (± 1.7 degrees) and after lengthening
was 90.0 degrees (± 3.2 degrees). The differences in the MPTA
for tibial lengthening were statistically significant (P < 0.01).
Finally, the mean PPTA preoperative was 79.7 degrees (± 4.0
degrees) and 78.1 degrees (± 3.6 degrees) after treatment.
This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.09)
(Table 2).
COMPLICATIONS
In the P1 group, there were 4 nail breakages in 3 patients
(4/58; 7%), occurring in 3 femurs and 1 tibia (Fig. 5). All 4 nail
breakages occurred in 3 patients who were admitted to not
adhering to weight-bearing restrictions during the consolidation
phase. These 3 patients were advised to remain at 50 lb (23 kg) weight-bearing with crutches or a walker until
monthly radiographs demonstrated 3 intact cortices.9,17,19
None of these 3 had achieved cortical bridging. All 3 femurs
bent into procurvatum and varus deformity. All 3 femurs were
treated by fixator-assisted nailing of the femurs. Under general
anesthesia, the femur was straightened using 2 uniplanar
external fixators (anterior 2 pin monolateral and lateral 2 pin
monolateral). The broken PRECICE was removed through the
piriformis fossa after the femur was straight. If some parts
could not be extracted using long pituitary clamps, they were
removed by inserting a retrograde Rush rod to push the distal
end of the nail out the proximal end of the femur (Fig. 7). The
length and alignment of the femur was maintained by the
external fixator, whereas a standard femur locking nail (Trigen;
Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN) was inserted to stabilize the
femur. After this nail was locked, the biplanar external fixators
were removed, during the same operative procedure. The
purpose of the external fixators was as instruments to correct
the angular deformities and to maintain the alignment and
length during the renailing. All 3 femurs healed without any
loss of length and alignment. The fractures occurred during the
consolidation phase, on day 175 after surgery in the first
patient. The patient was walking unaided up the stairs. The
second patient fractured his left femur PRECICE, while
walking to bathroom on postoperative day 96. He, too, was
walking without crutches. After successfully treating the left
femur, he broke the right femur on day 119. In all 3 instances,
the nail broke through the weld of the nail that was either at the
proximal or distal end of the mechanism. There was 1 fracture
of a tibial P1 nail. This was identified at the time of elective
nail removal surgery. The patient did not know that the nail
had broken as the tibia healed uneventfully with a 5-degree
procurvatum diaphyseal bend (Fig. 5). The distal end of the
nail was extracted proximally by driving a Rush rod retrograde
through the medial malleolus, pushing the distal segment
proximally. There was 1 other femur fracture in the P1 group
(Fig. 8). This fracture occurred through the anterior-posterior
distal locking screw. The fracture occurred quite unexpectedly
during a physical therapy straight leg raising hamstring stretch
maneuver. The patient was again treated by fixator-assisted
nailing. The nail in this case was intact.