Limb Lengthening Research Papers
ORIGINAL CLINICAL ARTICLE
Cosmetic Limb Leg Lengthening: What Are The Limits?
F. Guerreschi, H. Tsibidakis
Received: 25 October 2016 / Accepted: 25 October 2016 / Published online: 11 November 2016
Page 3 - Patients and Methods Continued
Patient follow-up was performed every 3 months for the
first year and then every 2 years, evaluating patient satisfaction,
possible axial deviation, range of movement of the
knee and ankle, pronation of the foot, leg length discrepancy
and scars. According to the patient and physician
scores based on these parameters, the outcome of surgery
was classified as poor (0–4), fair (5–9), good (10–14) or
excellent (15–18).
Finally, psychological outcome after treatment was
evaluated by determining improvement in self-esteem,
distress, shyness and quality of life. All patients were asked
if they would undergo surgery again and whether they
would recommend it to others of similar stature.
Operative technique
The hybrid advanced fixator is a modification of the classic
Ilizarov fixator [9] combining Kirschner wires with halfpins
and full rings with arches [1, 11]. The standard
apparatus (3 rings and one half-ring for the leg) was
assembled preoperatively with the rings being sized
directly onto the patient’s legs and the wires and half-pins
applied with routine transfixation. The whole construct was
connected with threaded rods [11, 12].
Two osteotomies, using the Gigli saw or multiple drill
holes were carried out—one below the tibial tuberosity
and the other at the supramalleolar level. A fibular
osteotomy was performed at the junction of the middle
and distal third of the leg. A hand-controlled drill with a
speed of 0–1000 revolutions/min was used for the
insertion of the wires, and pilot holes were drilled before
insertion of the half-pins.
Lengthening was started 10 days after surgery at a rate
of 0.75 mm per day (one-quarter turn every 8 h) for each
tibia osteotomy.
Weight-bearing was encouraged on the second day after
surgery, according to tolerance, followed by a rehabilitation
program of gradual increased load-bearing and
physiotherapy.
Pin care began the day after surgery using hydrogen
peroxide and betadine.
Patients were discharged with instructions for bi-weekly
care of the pin site. Clinical and radiological examinations
were carried out every 30–40 days to assess new bone formation, pin sites, patient satisfaction, tibia length and
joint movements.
Bilateral leg lengthening of 5–8 cm was considered
satisfactory. Radiological criteria for successful lengthening
included complete bone bridging in at least two
radiographic projections. Bone regeneration was assessed
clinically by loosening the connecting rods and applying
stress. When consolidation of new bone was confirmed
clinically and radiologically, the frames were removed
under sedation. A fiberglass cast or braces including the
foot were applied for a mean of 6 weeks.
Results
The mean lengthening achieved in all patients who
underwent surgery was 7.2 cm (range 5–11 cm), with a
mean duration of treatment of 9 months and 15 days (range
7–18 months).
After removal of the frame, the fiberglass cast was
applied in 31 patients (49.2%) and braces including the
foot in 21 patients (33.3%). All patients performed physiotherapy
for a mean of 6 weeks (range 4–8 weeks). The
mean follow-up time was 6.14 years (range 1–10). Varus
knee deformity was corrected simultaneously in 8 patients.
In 21 patients (33.3%), bilateral lengthening of the Achilles
tendon was also necessary to correct the equinus deformity
that developed during distraction (Fig. 1).